Taxonomy of Educational Objectives

Evaluación | Biopsicología | Comparativo | Cognitivo | Del desarrollo | Idioma | Diferencias individuales | Personalidad | Filosofía | Social | Métodos | Estadística | Clínico | Educativo | Industrial | Artículos profesionales | Psicología mundial | Psicología de la Educación: Assessment · Issues · Theory & research · Techniques · Techniques X subject · Special Ed. · Pastoral Categories in the cognitive domain of Bloom's Taxonomy (Anderson & Krathwohl, 2001) The Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, often called Bloom's Taxonomy, is a classification of the different objectives and skills that educators set for students (learning objectives). The taxonomy was proposed in 1956 by Benjamin Bloom, an educational psychologist at the University of Chicago. Bloom's Taxonomy divides educational objectives into three "domains:" Affective, Psychomotor, and Cognitive. Like other taxonomies, Bloom's is hierarchical, meaning that learning at the higher levels is dependent on having attained prerequisite knowledge and skills at lower levels (Orlich, et al. 2004). A goal of Bloom's Taxonomy is to motivate educators to focus on all three domains, creating a more holistic form of education. Most references to the Bloom's Taxonomy only notice the Cognitive domain. There is also a so far less referred, revised version of the Taxonomy, publicado en 2001 under the name of "A Taxonomy for Learning, Enseñando, and assessing", Eds. Anderson, Lorin W., Krathwohl, David R., Airasian, Peter W., Cruikshank, Kathleen A., Mayer, Richard E., Pintrich, Paul R., Raths, James and Wittrock, Merlin C. Contenido 1 Affective 2 Psychomotor 3 Cognitivo 4 Ver también 5 References Affective Skills in the affective domain describe the way people react emotionally and their ability to feel another living thing's pain or joy. Affective objectives typically target the awareness and growth in attitudes, emoción, and feelings. There are five levels in the affective domain moving through the lowest order processes to the highest: Receiving The lowest level; the student passively pays attention. Without this level no learning can occur. Responding The student actively participates in the learning process, not only attends to a stimulus, the student also reacts in some way. Valuing The student attaches a value to an object, phenomenon, or piece of information. Organizing Students can put together different values, información, and ideas and accommodate them within their own schema; comparing, relating and elaborating on what has been learned. Characterizing The student has held a particular value or belief that now exerts influence on their behaviour so that it becomes a characteristic. Psychomotor Skills in the psychomotor domain describe the ability to physically manipulate a tool or instrument like a hand or a hammer. Psychomotor objectives usually focus on change and/or development in behavior and/or skills. Bloom and his colleagues never created subcategories for skills in the psychomotor domain, but since then other educators have created their own psychomotor taxonomies [1]. Cognitive Skills in the cognitive domain revolve around knowledge, comprehension, y "thinking through" a particular topic. Traditional education tends to emphasize the skills in this domain, particularly the lower-order objectives. There are six levels in the taxonomy, moving through the lowest order processes to the highest: Knowledge Exhibit memory of previously-learned materials by recalling facts, terms, basic concepts and answers Knowledge of specifics - terminology, specific facts Knowledge of ways and means of dealing with specifics - conventions, trends and sequences, classifications and categories, criteria, methodology Knowledge of the universals and abstractions in a field - principles and generalizations, theories and structures Questions like: What is...? Comprehension Demonstrative understanding of facts and ideas by organizing, comparing, translating, interpreting, giving descriptions, and stating main ideas Translation Interpretation Extrapolation Questions like: How would you compare and contrast...? Application Using new knowledge. Solve problems to new situations by applying acquired knowledge, hechos, techniques and rules in a different way Questions like: Can you organize _______ to show...? Analysis Examine and break information into parts by identifying motives or causes. Make inferences and find evidence to support generalizations Analysis of elements Analysis of relationships Analysis of organizational principles Questions like: How would you classify...? Synthesis Compile information together in a different way by combining elements in a new pattern or proposing alternative solutions Production of a unique communication Production of a plan, or proposed set of operations Derivation of a set of abstract relations Questions like: Can you predict an outcome? Evaluation Present and defend opinions by making judgments about information, validity of ideas or quality of work based on a set of criteria Judgments in terms of internal evidence Judgments in terms of external criteria Questions like: Do you agree with.....? Some critique on Bloom's Taxonomy('s cognitive domain) admit the existence of these six categories, but question the existence of a sequential, hierarchical link (Paul, R. (1993). Critical thinking: What every person needs to survive in a rapidly changing world (3rd ed.). Rohnert Park, California: Sonoma State University Press.). Also the revised edition of Bloom's taxonomy has moved Synthesis in higher order than Evaluation. Some consider the three lowest levels as hierarchically ordered, but the three higher levels as parallel. Others say that it is sometimes better to move to Application before introducing Concepts. This thinking would seem to relate to the method of Problem Based Learning. See also Cognitive rigor Educational psychology Educational technology Mastery learning Physical education David Krathwohl References Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals; páginas. 201-207; B. S. Floración (Ed.) Susan Fauer Company, Inc. 1956. A Taxonomy for Learning, Enseñando, and Assessing — A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives; Lorin W. Anderson, david r. Krathwohl, Peter W. Airasian, Kathleen A. Cruikshank, Richard E. Mayer, Paul R. Pintrich, James Raths and Merlin C. Wittrock (Eds.) Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. 2001 Esta página utiliza contenido con licencia Creative Commons de Wikipedia (ver autores).

Si quieres conocer otros artículos parecidos a Taxonomy of Educational Objectives puedes visitar la categoría Educational technology.

Deja una respuesta

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada.


we use own and third party cookies to improve user experience More information