Tamaño del efecto (estadístico)

for some cross-level and person-situation research designs: Organizational Research Methods Vol 2(4) Oct 1999, 395-418. Larzelere, R. E., & Kuhn, B. R. (2005). Comparing Child Outcomes of Physical Punishment and Alternative Disciplinary Tactics: A Meta-Analysis: Revisión de psicología clínica infantil y familiar, vol. 8(1) Estropear 2005, 1-37. León, Un. C., Shear, M. K., Portera, L., & Klerman, G. L. (1993). Effect size as a measure of symptom-specific drug change in clinical trials: Psychopharmacology Bulletin Vol 29(2) 1993, 163-167. Levine, T. R., & Hullett, C. R. (2002). Eta squared, partial eta squared, and misreporting of effect size in communication research: Human Communication Research Vol 28(4) Oct 2002, 612-625. Lincoln, T. M., & Rief, W. (2004). How much do sample characteristics affect the effect size? An investigation of studies testing the treatment effects for social phobia: Journal of Anxiety Disorders Vol 18(4) 2004, 515-529. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). The way in which intervention studies have "personalidad" and why it is important to meta-analysis: Evaluation & the Health Professions Vol 24(3) Sep 2001, 236-254. Liu, X., & Raudenbush, S. (2004). A Note on the Noncentrality Parameter and Effect Size Estimates for the F Test in ANOVA: Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics Vol 29(2) Suma 2004, 251-255. Luce, R. D. (1990). "On the possible psychophysical laws" revisited: Remarks on cross-modal matching: Revisión psicológica vol. 97(1) Ene 1990, 66-77. Lucke, J. F. (2004). Fall-Prevention Programs for the Elderly: A Bayesian Secondary Meta-analysis: CJNR: Canadian Journal of Nursing Research Vol 36(3) Sep 2004, 49-64. Ludlow, L. H. (1987). The graphical representation of quantitative research synthesis residual variation: Educational and Psychological Measurement Vol 47(4) Victoria 1987, 941-951. Lyday, N. L. (1984). A meta-analysis of the adjunct question literature: Resúmenes de disertación internacional. Maddock, J. E. (2000). Statistical power and effect size in the field of health psychology. Resúmenes de disertación internacional: Sección B: Las Ciencias y la Ingeniería. Malgady, R. G. (2007). How skewed are psychological data? A standardized index of effect size: Revista de psicología general vol. 134(3) Jul 2007, 355-359. Mangino, C. (2005). A meta-analysis of Dunn and Dunn model correlational research with adult populations. Resúmenes de tesis internacional Sección A: Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales. Maramba, G. G., & Nagayama Hall, G. C. (2002). Meta-analyses of ethnic match as a predictor of dropout, utilization, and level of functioning: Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology Vol 8(3) Ago 2002, 290-297. Marín, F., & Sanchez, J. (1996). Estimations of the effect size in meta-analysis: A Monte Carlo study of bias and efficiency: Volumen psicológico 17(3) 1996, 467-482. Marin-Martinez, F., & Sanchez-Meca, J. (1999). Averaging dependent effect sizes in meta-analysis: A cautionary note about procedures: La Revista Española de Psicología Vol. 2(1) Mayo 1999, 32-38. Marqués, J. G., Horner, R. H., Carr, E. G., Turnbull, Un. PAGS., Thompson, M., Behrens, G. Un., et al. (2000). A meta-analysis of positive behavior support. Mahwah, NJ: Editores asociados de Lawrence Erlbaum. Marshall, W. L., & McGuire, J. (2003). Effect Sizes in the Treatment of Sexual Offenders: Revista internacional de terapia de delincuentes y criminología comparada vol. 47(6) Dic 2003, 653-663. matsumoto, D., Grissom, R. J., & Dinnel, D. L. (2001). Do between-culture differences really mean that people are different? A look at some measures of cultural effect size: Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology Vol 32(4) Jul 2001, 478-490. Matt, G. E. (1987). Effects of treatment and characteristics of research studies: A meta-analytical investigation of the practice of psychotherapy outcome research: Gruppendynamik Vol 18(4) Nov 1987, 345-360. Matt, G. E. (1989). Decision rules for selecting effect sizes in meta-analysis: A review and reanalysis of psychotherapy outcome studies: Psychological Bulletin Vol 105(1) Ene 1989, 106-115. Matt, G. E., & Navarro, Un. M. (1997). What meta-analyses have and have not taught us about psychotherapy effects: A review and future directions: Revisión de psicología clínica vol. 17(1) 1997, 1-32. Mawhinney, T. C. (1999). Cumulatively large benefits of incrementally small intervention effects: Costing metacontingencies of chronic absenteeism: Journal of Organizational Behavior Management Vol 18(4) 1999, 83-95. Maxwell, S. E. (2000). Sample size and multiple regression analysis: Psychological Methods Vol 5(4) Dic 2000, 434-458. Maxwell, S. E. (2004). The Persistence of Underpowered Studies in Psychological Research: Causas, Consecuencias, and Remedies: Psychological Methods Vol 9(2) Jun 2004, 147-163. Maxwell, S. E., Kelley, K., & Rausch, J. R. (2008). Sample size planning for statistical power and accuracy in parameter estimation: Annual Review of Psychology Vol 59 2008, 537-563. Mayo, K., & Hittner, J. B. (1997). Tests for comparing dependent correlations revisited: A Monte Carlo study: Journal of Experimental Education Vol 65(3) Spr 1997, 257-269. Mazen, Un. M., Graf, L. Un., Kellogg, C. E., & Hemmasi, M. (1987). Statistical power in contemporary management research: Academy of Management Journal Vol 30(2) Jun 1987, 369-380. McCarley, R. W., Wible, C. G., Frumin, M., Hirayasu, Y., Levitt, J., & Shenton, M. E. (2001). "MRI anatomy of schizophrenia": Respuesta: Psiquiatría Biológica Vol 49(2) Ene 2001, 162-163. McCartney, K., & Rosenthal, R. (2000). Tamaño del efecto, practical importance, and social policy for children: Vol. desarrollo infantil 71(1) ene-feb 2000, 173-180. McConaghy, N. (1990). Can reliance be placed on a single meta-analysis? : Revista de psiquiatría de Australia y Nueva Zelanda, vol. 24(3) Sep 1990, 405-415. McGowan, Un. S. (2003). New and Practical Sections in the Journal of Counseling & Development: Information for the Prospective Author and the Readership: Journal of Counseling & Development Vol 81(4) Fal 2003, 387-388. McGrath, R. E., & Ingersoll, J. (1999). Writing a good cookbook: II. A synthesis of MMPI high-point code system study effect sizes: Journal of Personality Effect Size Simulation Studies to Cover Some Small-Sample Cases: Educational and Psychological Measurement Vol 67(1) Feb 2007, 59-72. Nordhus, Yo. H., & Pallesen, S. (2003). Psychological treatment of late-life anxiety: An empirical review: Revista de Consultoría y Psicología Clínica Vol. 71(4) Ago 2003, 643-651. normando, G. (2003). The Effectiveness and the Effects of Effect Sizes: Advances in Health Sciences Education Vol 8(3) 2003, 183-187. Nouri, H., & Greenberg, R. H. (1995). Meta-analytic procedures for estimation of effect sizes in experiments using complex analysis of variance: Journal of Management Vol 21(4) 1995, 801-812. Nugent, W. R. (2006). The Comparability of the Standardized Mean Difference Effect Size Across Different Measures of the Same Construct: Measurement Considerations: Educational and Psychological Measurement Vol 66(4) Ago 2006, 612-623. Nummenmaa, L. (2005). Effect size in psychological science: Psykologia Vol 40(5-6) 2005, 559-567. Nummenmaa, L., & Niemi, P. (2004). Inducing Affective States With Success-Failure Manipulations: A Meta-Analysis: Emotion Vol 4(2) Jun 2004, 207-214. Oh, I.-S. (2007). In Search of Ideal Methods of Research Synthesis Over 30 Years (1977-2006): Comparison of Hunter-Schmidt Meta-Analysis Methods With Other Methods and Recent Improvements: International Journal of Testing Vol 7(1) 2007, 89-93. Cable, M. Un., & Lockwood, C. M. (2003). Does level of assessment moderate the relation between social support and social negativity? Un metanálisis: Psicología Social Básica y Aplicada Vol. 25(1) Estropear 2003, 15-35. Olejnik, S., & Algina, J. (2000). Measures of effect size for comparative studies: Aplicaciones, interpretaciones, and limitations: Contemporary Educational Psychology Vol 25(3) Jul 2000, 241-286. Olejnik, S., & Algina, J. (2003). Generalized Eta and Omega Squared Statistics: Measures of Effect Size for Some Common Research Designs: Psychological Methods Vol 8(4) Dic 2003, 434-447. Olive, M. L., & Smith, B. W. (2005). Effect Size Calculations and Single Subject Designs: Educational Psychology Vol 25(2-3) Abr-Jun 2005, 313-324. Onwuegbuzie, Un. J. (2003). Effect Sizes in Qualitative Research: A Prolegomenon: Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology Vol 37(4) Nov 2003, 393-409. Onwuegbuzie, Un. J., & Leech, N. L. (2004). Post Hoc Power: A Concept Whose Time Has Come: Understanding Statistics Vol 3(4) 2004, 201-230. Osborne, J. W. (2008). Sweating the small stuff in educational psychology: How effect size and power reporting failed to change from 1969 Para 1999, and what that means for the future of changing practices: Educational Psychology Vol 28(2) Apr 2008, 1-10. Ottenbacher, K. J. (1984). Measures of relationship strength in occupational therapy research: Occupational Therapy Journal of Research Vol 4(4) Oct 1984, 271-285. Otto, M. W., Tuby, K. S., Gould, R. Un., Mclean, R. Y. S., & Pollack, M. H. (2001). An effect-size analysis of the relative efficacy and tolerability of serotonin selective reuptake inhibitors for panic disorder: Revista Americana de Psiquiatría Vol 158(12) Dic 2001, 1989-1992. Overton, R. C. (1998). A comparison of fixed-effects and mixed (random-effects) models for meta-analysis tests of moderator variable effects: Psychological Methods Vol 3(3) Sep 1998, 354-379. Ozer, D. J. (1985). Correlation and the coefficient of determination: Psychological Bulletin Vol 97(2) Estropear 1985, 307-315. Ozer, D. J. (2007). Evaluating effect size in personality research. Nueva York, NY: Prensa Guilford. Parker, R. Yo., Brossart, D. F., Vannest, K. J., Largo, J. R., De-Alba, R. G., Baugh, F. G., et al. (2005). Effect Sizes in Single Case Research: How Large is Large? : School Psychology Review Vol 34(1) 2005, 116-132. Parker, R. Yo., & Hagan-Burke, S. (2007). Median-based overlap analysis for single case data: A second study: Behavior Modification Vol 31(6) Nov 2007, 919-936. Parker, R. Yo., & Hagan-Burke, S. (2007). Useful effect size interpretations for single case research: Terapia conductual vol. 38(1) Estropear 2007, 95-105. Parker, R. Yo., Hagan-Burke, S., & Vannest, K. (2007). Percentage of All Non-Overlapping Data (PAND): An Alternative to PND: The Journal of Special Education Vol 40(4) Victoria 2007, 194-204. Parker, S. (1995). los "difference of means" may not be the "effect size": American Psychologist Vol 50(12) Dic 1995, 1101-1102. Parsons, T. D., & Nelson, N. W. (2004). Paradigm Shift in Social Science Research: A Significance Testing and Effect Size Estimation Rapprochement? : PsycCRITIQUES Vol 49 (Suppl 3), 2004. pato, M. T., & Gluhoski, V. (1992). Serotonin and effect sizes of antiobsessive agents: Revista Americana de Psiquiatría Vol 149(3) Estropear 1992, 420-421. Paul, K. M., & Plucker, J. Un. (2004). Two steps forward, one step back: Effect size reporting in gifted education research from 1995-2000: Roeper Review Vol 26(2) Victoria 2004, 68-72. Peach, R. K. (2003). From the editor: American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology Vol 12(3) Ago 2003, 258. Pedersen, S. (2003). Effect sizes and "what if" analyses as supplements to statistical significance tests: Journal of Early Intervention Vol 25(4) Suma 2003, 310-319. Penny, J. Un. (2003). Exploring differential item functioning in a 360-degree assessment: Rater source and method of delivery: Organizational Research Methods Vol 6(1) Ene 2003, 61-79. Peterson, R. Un., Albaum, G., & Beltramini, R. F. (1985). A meta-analysis of effect sizes in consumer behavior experiments: Revista de investigación del consumidor vol. 12(1) Jun 1985, 97-103. Peterson, R. Un., & Brown, S. P. (2005). On the Use of Beta Coefficients in Meta-Analysis: Revista de psicología aplicada vol. 90(1) Ene 2005, 175-181. Phillips, G. Un. (2004). The aggregation of interaction effect sizes from primary psychotherapy outcome studies: Un metanálisis. Resúmenes de disertación internacional: Sección B: Las Ciencias y la Ingeniería. Pierce, C. Un., Bloquear, R. Un., & Aguinis, H. (2004). Cautionary Note on Reporting Eta-Squared Values From Multifactor ANOVA Designs: Educational and Psychological Measurement Vol 64(6) Dic 2004, 916-924. Pigott, T. D. (2001). Missing predictors in models of effect size: Evaluation & the Health Professions Vol 24(3) Sep 2001, 277-307. Plucker, J. Un. (1997). Debunking the myth of the "highly significant" resultado: Effect sizes in gifted education research: Roeper Review Vol 20(2) Dic 1997, 122-126. Posavac, E. J., & Miller, T. Q. (1990). Some problems caused by not having a conceptual foundation for health research: An illustration from studies of the psychological effects of abortion: Psychology & Health Vol 5(1) 1990, 13-23. prendergast, M. L., Podus, D., chang, E., & Urada, D. (2002). The effectiveness of drug abuse treatment: A meta-analysis of comparison group studies: Dependencia de drogas y alcohol vol. 67(1) Jun 2002, 53-72. prendergast, M. L., Podus, D., chang, E., & Urada, D. (2006). Erratum to "The effectiveness of drug abuse treatment: A meta-analysis of comparison group studies": Dependencia de drogas y alcohol vol. 84(1) Sep 2006, 133. Prentice, D. Un., & Miller, D. T. (1992). When small effects are impressive: Psychological Bulletin Vol 112(1) Jul 1992, 160-164. Prentice, D. Un., & Miller, D. T. (2003). When small effects are impressive. Washington, DC: Asociación Americana de Psicología. Radin, D., nelson, R., Dobyns, Y., & Houtkooper, J. (2006). Reexamining Psychokinesis: Comment on Bosch, Steinkamp, and Boller (2006): Psychological Bulletin Vol 132(4) Jul 2006, 529-532. Ramirez, M. T. G., & Botella, J. (2006). Comparison among effect-size indices for dichotomized outcomes in meta-analysis: Volumen psicológico 27(2) 2006, 269-293. Raudenbush, S. W. (1994). Random effects models. Nueva York, NY: Fundación Russell Sage. Raudenbush, S. W., Becker, B. J., & Kalaian, H. (1988). Modeling multivariate effect sizes: Psychological Bulletin Vol 103(1) Ene 1988, 111-120. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, Un. S. (1985). Empirical Bayes meta-analysis: Journal of Educational Statistics Vol 10(2) Suma 1985, 75-98. Raudenbush, S. W., & Liu, X. (2000). Statistical power and optimal design for multisite randomized trials: Psychological Methods Vol 5(2) Jun 2000, 199-213. Ray, J. W. (1996). An evaluation of the agreement between exact and inexact effect sizes in meta-analysis. Resúmenes de disertación internacional: Sección B: Las Ciencias y la Ingeniería. Ray, J. W., & Shadish, W. R. (1996). How interchangeable are different estimators of effect size? : Revista de Consultoría y Psicología Clínica Vol. 64(6) Dic 1996, 1316-1325. Ray, J. W., & Shadish, W. R. (1998). "How interchangeable are different estimators of effect size?": Correction to Ray and Shadish (1996): Revista de Consultoría y Psicología Clínica Vol. 66(3) Jun 1998, 532. Ree, M. J. (2003). Review of Score reliability: Contemporary thinking on reliability issues: Personnel Psychology Vol 56(4) Victoria 2003, 1090-1092. Reichardt, C. S. (2006). The principle of parallelism in the design of studies to estimate treatment effects: Psychological Methods Vol 11(1) Estropear 2006, 1-18. Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (2005). Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC Area, d de Cohen, and r: Ley y comportamiento humano vol. 29(5) Oct 2005, 615-620. richardson, J. T. E. (1996). Measures of effect size: Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers Vol 28(1) Feb 1996, 12-22. Riopelle, Un. J. (2000). Are effect sizes and confidence levels problems for or solutions to the null hypothesis test? : Revista de psicología general vol. 127(2) Apr 2000, 198-216. Rispens, J., Aleman, Un., & Goudena, P. P. (1997). Prevention of child sexual abuse victimization: A meta-analysis of school programs: Child Abuse & Neglect Vol 21(10) Oct 1997, 975-987. Roberts, J. K., & Henson, R. K. (2002). Correction for bias in estimating effect sizes: Educational and Psychological Measurement Vol 62(2) Apr 2002, 241-253. Robey, R. R. (2004). Reporting point and interval estimates of effect-size for planned contrasts: Fixed within effect analyses of variance: Journal of Fluency Disorders Vol 29(4) Victoria 2004, 307-341. Robinson, D. H., Fouladi, R. T., Williams, N. J., & Bera, S. J. (2002). Some effects of including effect size and "What If" in formation: Journal of Experimental Education Vol 70(4) Suma 2002, 365-382. Robinson, D. H., Whittaker, T. Un., Williams, N. J., & Beretvas, S. N. (2003). It's Not Effect Sizes So Much as Comments About Their Magnitude That Mislead Readers: Journal of Experimental Education Vol 72(1) Fal 2003, 51-64. Rochelle, K. S. H., & Talcott, J. B. (2006). Impaired balance in developmental dyslexia? A meta-analysis of the contending evidence: Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry Vol 47(11) Nov 2006, 1159-1166. Romanoski, J., & Douglas, G. (2002). Rasch-transformed raw scores and two-way ANOVA: A simulation analysis: Journal of Applied Measurement Vol 3(4) 2002, 421-430. Rosendahl, E. (2007). Effect size underestimates the effects of interventions among older people with severe physical or cognitive impairments? : Revista de la Sociedad Americana de Geriatría Vol 55(8) Ago 2007, 1315-1316. Rosenthal, J. Un. (1996). Qualitative descriptors of strength of association and effect size: Journal of Social Service Research Vol 21(4) 1996, 37-59. Rosenthal, R. (1990). How are we doing in soft psychology? : American Psychologist Vol 45(6) Jun 1990, 775-777. Rosenthal, R. (1991). Effect sizes: Pearson's correlation, its display via the BESD, and alternative indices: American Psychologist Vol 46(10) Oct 1991, 1086-1087. Rosenthal, R. (1994). Parametric measures of effect size. Nueva York, NY: Fundación Russell Sage. Rosenthal, R. (2006). Praising Pearson Properly: Correlations, Contrasts, and Construct Validity. Mahwah, NJ: Editores asociados de Lawrence Erlbaum. Rosenthal, R., Rosnow, R. L., & Rubin, D. B. (2000). Contrasts and effect sizes in behavioral research: A correlational approach. Nueva York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1986). Meta-analytic procedures for combining studies with multiple effect sizes: Psychological Bulletin Vol 99(3) Mayo 1986, 400-406. Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1989). Effect size estimation for one-sample multiple-choice-type data: Diseño, análisis, and meta-analysis: Psychological Bulletin Vol 106(2) Sep 1989, 332-337. Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1991). Further issues in effect size estimation for one-sample multiple-choice-type data: Psychological Bulletin Vol 109(2) Estropear 1991, 351-352. Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1992). An effect size estimator for parapsychological research: European Journal of Parapsychology Vol 9 1992-1993, 1-11. Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1994). The counternull value of an effect size: A new statistic: Ciencia Psicológica Vol. 5(6) Nov 1994, 329-334. Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (2003). r-sub(equivalent): A Simple Effect Size Indicator: Psychological Methods Vol 8(4) Dic 2003, 492-496. Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (1988). Focused tests of significance and effect size estimation in counseling psychology: Journal of Counseling Psychology Vol 35(2) Apr 1988, 203-208. Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (1992). Focused tests of significance and effect size estimation in counseling psychology. Washington, DC: Asociación Americana de Psicología. Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (1996). Computing contrasts, effect sizes, and counternulls on other people's published data: General procedures for research consumers: Psychological Methods Vol 1(4) Dic 1996, 331-340. Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (2002). Contrasts and correlations in theory assessment: Journal of Pediatric Psychology Vol 27(1) Ene 2002, 59-66. Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (2003). Effect sizes for experimenting psychologists: Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale Vol 57(3) Sep 2003, 221-237. Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (2008). Assessing the effect size of outcome research. Nueva York, NY: Oxford University Press. Rosnow, R. L., Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (2000). Contrasts and correlations in effect-size estimation: Ciencia Psicológica Vol. 11(6) Nov 2000, 446-453. Rossi, J. S. (1985). Statistical power of psychological research: The artifactual basis of controversial results: Resúmenes de disertación internacional. Rossi, J. S. (1985). Tables of effect size for z score tests of differences between proportions and between correlation coefficients: Educational and Psychological Measurement Vol 45(4) Victoria 1985, 737-743. Rothstein, H. R., McDaniel, M. Un., & Borenstein, M. (2002). Meta-analysis: A review of quantitative cumulation methods. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bajo. Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2005). Relational and Arelational Confidence Intervals: A Comment on Fidler, Thomason, correrse, Finch, and Leeman (2004): Ciencia Psicológica Vol. 16(1) Ene 2005, 77-79. Frotar, D. B. (1992). Meta-analysis: Literature synthesis or effect-size surface estimation? : Journal of Educational Statistics Vol 17(4) Victoria 1992, 363-374. Frotar, D. B. (1993). Statistical tools for meta-analysis: From straightforward to esoteric. Nueva York, NY ; París, Francia: Cambridge University Press; Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l'Homme. Rudas, T., & Zwick, R. (1997). Estimating the importance of differential item functioning: Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics Vol 22(1) Spr 1997, 31-45. russell, C. J., Caballo pinto, J. K., & Bobko, P. (1991). Appropriate moderated regression and inappropriate research strategy: A demonstration of information loss due to scale coarseness: Applied Psychological Measurement Vol 15(3) Sep 1991, 257-266. Rutledge, T., & Loh, C. (2004). Effect sizes and statistical testing in the determination of clinical significance in behavioral medicine research: Annals of Behavioral Medicine Vol 27(2) Spr 2004, 138-145. Sack, M., Lempa, W., & Lamprecht, F. (2001). Study quality and effect-sizes: A meta-analysis of EMDR-treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder: Psicoterapia Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie Vol 51(9-10) Sep-Oct 2001, 350-355. Sailor, K. M., & Antoine, M. (2005). Is memory for stimulus magnitude Bayesian? : Memory & Cognition Vol 33(5) Jul 2005, 840-851. Sanchez-Meca, J., & Marin-Martinez, F. (1998). Weighting by inverse variance or by sample size in meta-analysis: A simulation study: Educational and Psychological Measurement Vol 58(2) Apr 1998, 211-220. Sanchez-Meca, J., Marin-Martinez, F., & Chacon-Moscoso, S. (2003). Effect-Size Indices for Dichotomized Outcomes in Meta-Analysis: Psychological Methods Vol 8(4) Dic 2003, 448-467. Sanderson, K., Andrés, G., Corry, J., & Lapsley, H. (2004). Using the effect size to model change in preference values from descriptive health status: Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care & Rehabilitation Vol 13(7) Sep 2004, 1255-1264. Sapp, M. (2004). Confidence Intervals Within Hypnosis Research: Sueño e Hipnosis Vol 6(4) 2004, 169-176. Schalm, R. L., & Kelloway, E. K. (2001). The relationship between response rate and effect size in occupational health psychology research: Journal of Occupational Health Psychology Vol 6(2) Apr 2001, 160-163. Schatz, PAGS., Arrendajo, K. Un., McComb, J., & McLaughlin, J. R. (2005). Misuse of statistical tests in Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology publications: Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology Vol 20(8) Dic 2005, 1053-1059. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2003). Meta-analysis. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc. Schnurr, P. P. (1989). Measuring amount of symptom change in the diagnosis of premenstrual syndrome: Evaluación psicológica: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology Vol 1(4) Dic 1989, 277-283. Schooler, N. R. (2001). The statistical comparison of clinical trials: Revista de Psiquiatría Clínica Vol 62(Suppl9) 2001, 35-39. Schulze, R. (2004). Meta-analysis: A comparison of approaches. ashland, OH: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers. Schulze, R. (2007). Current methods for meta-analysis: Approaches, issues, and developments: Zeitschrift fur Psychologie/Journal of Psychology Vol 215(2) 2007, 90-103. Schuster, C. (2004). How measurement error in dichotomous predictors affects the analysis of continuous criteria: Psychology Science Vol 46(1) 2004, 128-136. Sedlmeier, PAGS., & Gigerenzer, G. (1989). Do studies of statistical power have an effect on the power of studies? : Psychological Bulletin Vol 105(2) Estropear 1989, 309-316. Sedlmeier, PAGS., & Gigerenzer, G. (1992). Do studies of statistical power have an effect on the power of studies? Washington, DC: Asociación Americana de Psicología. Sedlmeier, PAGS., & Kilinc, B. (2002). Beyond Uncritical Significance Testing: Contrasts and Effect Sizes: PsycCRITIQUES Vol 47 (4), Ago, 2002. Seignourel, PAGS., & Albarracin, D. (2002). Calculating Effect Sizes for Designs with Between-Subjects and Within-Subjects Factors: Methods for Partially Reported Statistics in Meta-analysis: Metodologia de las Ciencias del Comportamiento Vol 4(2) 2002, 273-289. Seltzer, M. H. (1993). Sensitivity analysis for fixed effects in the hierarchical model: A Gibbs sampling approach: Journal of Educational Statistics Vol 18(3) Fal 1993, 207-235. Serlin, R. C., Wampold, B. E., & Levin, J. R. (2003). Should Providers of Treatment Be Regarded as a Random Factor? If It Ain't Broke, Don't "Fix" Eso: A Comment on Siemer and Joormann (2003): Psychological Methods Vol 8(4) Dic 2003, 524-534. Shadish, W. R., & Haddock, C. K. (1994). Combining estimates of effect size. Nueva York, NY: Fundación Russell Sage. Shadish, W. R., & Ragsdale, K. (1996). Random versus nonrandom assignment in controlled experiments: Do you get the same answer? : Revista de Consultoría y Psicología Clínica Vol. 64(6) Dic 1996, 1290-1305. Shaffer, J. P. (1991). Comment on "Effect size estimation for one-sample multiple-choice-type data: Diseño, análisis, and meta-analysis" by Rosenthal and Rubin (1989): Psychological Bulletin Vol 109(2) Estropear 1991, 348-350. Sheridan, S. M., Eagle, J. W., Cowan, R. J., & Mickelson, W. (2001). The effects of conjoint behavioral consultation results of a 4-year investigation: Journal of School Psychology Vol 39(5) Sep-Oct 2001, 361-385. Sherwood, S. J., & Roe, C. Un. (2003). A review of dream ESP studies conducted since the Maimonides dream ESP programme. Charlottesville, Virginia: Imprint Academic. Shrum, L. J. (2007). The Implications of Survey Method for Measuring Cultivation Effects: Human Communication Research Vol 33(1) Ene 2007, 64-80. Siemer, M., & Joormann, J. (2003). Assumptions and Consequences of Treating Providers in Therapy Studies as Fixed Versus Random Effects: Reply to Crits-Christoph, Tu, and Gallop (2003) and Serlin, Wampold, and Levin (2003): Psychological Methods Vol 8(4) Dic 2003, 535-544. Siemer, M., & Joormann, J. (2003). Power and Measures of Effect Size in Analysis of Variance With Fixed Versus Random Nested Factors: Psychological Methods Vol 8(4) Dic 2003, 497-517. Sink, C. Un., & Stroh, H. R. (2006). Practical Significance: The Use of Effect Sizes in School Counseling Research: Professional School Counseling Vol 9(5,SpecIssue) Jun 2006, 401-411. Pequeño, G. W., Schneider, L. S., Hamilton, S. H., & Bystritsky, Un. (1996). Site variability in a multisite geriatric depression trial: Revista internacional de psiquiatría geriátrica vol. 11(12) Dic 1996, 1089-1095. Herrero, C. J. (1996). Pluralistic ignorance: An integration of perceptions of difference. Resúmenes de disertación internacional: Sección B: Las Ciencias y la Ingeniería. Herrero, M., Pozos, J., & Borrie, M. (2006). Treatment Effect Size of Memantine Therapy in Alzheimer Disease and Vascular Dementia: Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders Vol 20(3) Navidad-septiembre 2006, 133-137. Smithson, M. (2001). Correct confidence intervals for various regression effect sizes and parameters: The importance of noncentral distributions in computing intervals: Educational and Psychological Measurement Vol 61(4) Ago 2001, 605-632. Snyder, PAGS., & Lawson, S. (1993). Evaluating results using corrected and uncorrected effect size estimates: Journal of Experimental Education Vol 61(4) Suma 1993, 334-349. Sobel, M. E. (1990). Effect analysis and causation in linear structural equation models: Psychometrika Vol 55(3) Sep 1990, 495-515. Sohn, D. (1982). Sex differences in achievement self-attributions: An effect-size analysis: Roles sexuales vol. 8(4) Apr 1982, 345-357. Sporer, S. L., & Schwandt, B. (2006). Paraverbal Indicators of Deception: A Meta-analytic Synthesis: Psicología Cognitiva Aplicada Vol. 20(4) Mayo 2006, 421-446. Stajkovic, Un. D. (1999). Fitting Parametric Fixed Effect Categorical Models to Effect Sizes: A Neglected Meta-Analytic Approach in Organizational Studies: Organizational Research Methods Vol 2(1) Ene 1999, 88-102. Stam, R., van Laar, T.-J., Akkermans, L. M. Un., & Wiegant, V. M. (2002). Variability factors in the expression of stress-induced behavioural sensitisation: Investigación del cerebro conductual Vol 132(1) Apr 2002, 69-76. Standley, J. M. (1996). A brief introduction to meta-analysis: Journal of Research in Music Education Vol 44(2) Suma 1996, 101-104. Rígido, S., Chernyshenko, O. S., & Drasgow, F. (2004). Examining the Effects of Differential Item (Functioning and Differential) Test Functioning on Selection Decisions: When Are Statistically Significant Effects Practically Important? : Revista de psicología aplicada vol. 89(3) Jun 2004, 497-508. Steiger, J. H. (2004). Beyond the F Test: Effect Size Confidence Intervals and Tests of Close Fit in the Analysis of Variance and Contrast Analysis: Psychological Methods Vol 9(2) Jun 2004, 164-182. Steinberg, L., & Thissen, D. (2006). Using Effect Sizes for Research Reporting: Examples Using Item Response Theory to Analyze Differential Item Functioning: Psychological Methods Vol 11(4) Dic 2006, 402-415. Stigleitner, Yo. (1966). The influence of irrelevant, concomittant attributes on the exponent of a psychophysical function. (Experiments of weight-size-effects): Zeitschrift fur Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie 13(2) 1966, 334-344. Strahan, R. F. (1991). Remarks on the binomial effect size display: American Psychologist Vol 46(10) Oct 1991, 1083-1084. Strohmer, D. C., & Arm, J. R. (2006). The More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same: Reaction to AEgisdottir et al.: Counseling Psychologist Vol 34(3) Mayo 2006, 383-390. Strube, M. J. (1988). Some comments on the use of magnitude-of-effect estimates: Journal of Counseling Psychology Vol 35(3) Jul 1988, 342-345. Strube, M. J., & Goldstein, M. D. (1995). A computer program that demonstrates the difference between main effects and interactions: Teaching of Psychology Vol 22(3) Oct 1995, 207-208. Sol, S. (2007). The role of nonnormality and model specification in testing latent variable interactions: A Monte Carlo study. Resúmenes de tesis internacional Sección A: Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales. Susmán, E. B. (1998). Aprendizaje cooperativo: A review of factors that increase the effectiveness of cooperative computer-based instruction: Journal of Educational Computing Research Vol 18(4) 1998, 303-322. Swanson, H. L. (1999). Instructional components that predict treatment outcomes for students with learning disabilities: Support for a combined strategy and direct instruction model: Learning Disabilities Research & Practice Vol 14(3) Suma 1999, 129-140. Swanson, H. L. (2000). What instruction works for students with learning disabilities? Summarizing the results from a meta-analysis of intervention studies. Mahwah, NJ: Editores asociados de Lawrence Erlbaum. Swanson, H. L., & Sachse-Lee, C. (2000). A meta-analysis of single-subject-design intervention research for students with LD: Journal of Learning Disabilities Vol 33(2) Mar-Abr 2000, 114-136. Swim, J. K. (1994). Perceived versus meta-analytic effect sizes: An assessment of the accuracy of gender stereotypes: Revista de personalidad y psicología social vol. 66(1) Ene 1994, 21-36. Tachibana, T. (1984). A critical view of the utility of positive controls in a test battery: Neurobehavioral Toxicology & Teratology Vol 6(2) Estropear 1984, 155-159. Tachibana, T., Terada, Y., Fukunishi, K., & Tanimura, T. (1996). Estimated magnitude of behavioural effects of phenytoin in rats and its reproducibility: A collaborative behavioral teratology study in Japan: Physiology & Behavior Vol 60(3) Sep 1996, 941-952. Tatsuoka, M. (1993). Tamaño del efecto. Hillsdale, NJ, Inglaterra: Lawrence Erlbaum Asociados, Inc. Taylor, M. J., & White, K. R. (1992). An evaluation of alternative methods for computing standardized mean difference effect size: Journal of Experimental Education Vol 61(1) Fal 1992, 63-72. Tomás, H. (1986). Effect size standard errors for the non-normal non-identically distributed case: Journal of Educational Statistics Vol 11(4) Victoria 1986, 293-303. Thompson, B. (1986). ANOVA versus regression analysis of ATI designs: An empirical investigation: Educational and Psychological Measurement Vol 46(4) Victoria 1986, 917-928. Thompson, B. (1988). CANPOW: A program that estimates effect or sample sizes required for canonical correlation analysis: Educational and Psychological Measurement Vol 48(3) Fal 1988, 693-696. Thompson, B. (1989). Statistical significance, result importance, and result generalizability: Three noteworthy but somewhat different issues: Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development Vol 22(1) Apr 1989, 2-6. Thompson, B. (1999). Improving research clarity and usefulness with effect size indices as supplements to statistical significance tests: Exceptional Children Vol 65(3) Spr 1999, 329-337. Thompson, B. (1999). Statistical significance tests, effect size reporting and the vain pursuit of pseudo-objectivity: Theory & Psychology Vol 9(2) Apr 1999, 191-196. Thompson, B. (2002). "Statistical," "practical", y "clínico": How many kinds of significance do counselors need to consider? : Journal of Counseling & Development Vol 80(1) Victoria 2002, 64-71. Thompson, B. (2006). Research Synthesis: Effect Sizes. Mahwah, NJ: Editores asociados de Lawrence Erlbaum. Thompson, B. (2006). Review of Effect Sizes for Research: A Broad Practical Approach: Applied Psychological Measurement Vol 30(1) Ene 2006, 75-77. Thompson, B. (2006). Role of effect sizes in contemporary research in counseling: Counseling and Values Vol 50(3) Apr 2006, 176-186. Thompson, B. (2007). Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and confidence intervals for effect sizes: Psychology in the Schools Vol 44(5) Mayo 2007, 423-432. Thompson, B., & Noferi, G. (2003). Statistical, practical, clínico: How many types of significance should be considered in counseling research? : Bollettino di Psicologia Applicata No 240 May-Aug 2003, 3-13. Thompson, K. N., & Schumacker, R. E. (1997). An evaluation of Rosenthal and Rubin's binomial effect size display: Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics Vol 22(1) Spr 1997, 109-117. Thum, Y. M. (2003). Measuring Progress Toward a Goal: Estimating Teacher Productivity Using a Multivariate Multilevel Model for Value-Added Analysis: Sociological Methods & Research Vol 32(2) Nov 2003, 153-207. Thurber, S. (1985). Effect size estimates in chemical aversion treatments of alcoholism: Revista de Psicología Clínica Vol 41(2) Estropear 1985, 285-287. Tillitski, C. J. (1990). A meta-analysis of estimated effect sizes for group versus individual versus control treatments: International Journal of Group Psychotherapy Vol 40(2) Apr 1990, 215-224. Timm, N. H. (1999). A note on testing for multivariate effect sizes: Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics Vol 24(2) Suma 1999, 132-145. Timm, N. H. (1999). Testing multivariate effect sizes in multiple-endpoint studies: Multivariate Behavioral Research Vol 34(4) 1999, 457-465. Timm, N. H. (2002). Testing non-nested multivariate effect size models in meta-analysis: Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics Vol 27(4) Victoria 2002, 321-333. Trusty, J., Thompson, B., & Petrocelli, J. V. (2004). Practical Guide for Reporting Effect Size in Quantitative Research in the Journal of Counseling & Development: Journal of Counseling & Development Vol 82(1) Victoria 2004, 107-110. Vacha-Haase, T. (2001). Statistical significance should not be considered one of life's guarantees: Effect sizes are needed: Educational and Psychological Measurement Vol 61(2) Apr 2001, 219-224. Vacha-Haase, T., Kogan, L. R., & Thompson, B. (2000). Sample compositions and variabilities in published studies versus those in test manuals: Validity of score reliability inductions: Educational and Psychological Measurement Vol 60(4) Ago 2000, 509-522. Vacha-Haase, T., Nilsson, J. E., Reetz, D. R., Lance, T. S., & Thompson, B. (2000). Reporting practices and APA editorial policies regarding statistical significance and effect size: Theory & Psychology Vol 10(3) Jun 2000, 413-425. Vacha-Haase, T., & Thompson, B. (2004). How to Estimate and Interpret Various Effect Sizes: Journal of Counseling Psychology Vol 51(4) Oct 2004, 473-481. Van Den Noortgate, W., & Onghena, P. (2003). Estimating the mean effect size in meta-analysis: Parcialidad, precision, and mean squared error of different weighting methods: Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers Vol 35(4) Nov 2003, 504-511. Van den Noortgate, W., & Onghena, P. (2003). Hierarchical linear models for the quantitative integration of effect sizes in single-case research: Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers Vol 35(1) Apr 2003, 1-10. Vargha, Un., & Delaney, H. D. (2000). A critique and improvement of the CL common language effect size statistics of McGraw and Wong: Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics Vol 25(2) Suma 2000, 101-132. Verguts, T., Fias, W., & Stevens, M. (2005). A model of exact small-number representation: Psychonomic Bulletin & Review Vol 12(1) Feb 2005, 66-80. Vevea, J. L., & Hedges, L. V. (1995). A general linear model for estimating effect size in the presence of publication bias: Psychometrika Vol 60(3) Sep 1995, 419-435. Vevea, J. L., & Woods, C. M. (2005). Publication Bias in Research Synthesis: Sensitivity Analysis Using A Priori Weight Functions: Psychological Methods Vol 10(4) Dic 2005, 428-443. Viechtbauer, W. (2005). Bias and Efficiency of Meta-Analytic Variance Estimators in the Random-Effects Model: Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics Vol 30(3) Fal 2005, 261-293. Voelkle, M. C., Ackerman, P. L., & Wittman, W. W. (2007). Effect Sizes and F Ratios < 1.0. Sense or Nonsense? : Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences Vol 3(1) 2007, 35-46. Volker, M. A. (2006). Reporting Effect Size Estimates in School Psychology Research: Psychology in the Schools Vol 43(6) Jul 2006, 653-672. Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables: Psychological Bulletin Vol 117(2) Mar 1995, 250-270. Wahlsten, D. (2007). Sample size requirements for experiments on laboratory animals. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. Wainer, H. (2000). Rescuing computerized testing by breaking Zipf's law: Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics Vol 25(2) Sum 2000, 203-224. Wampold, B. E., Imel, Z. E., & Minami, T. (2007). The placebo effect: "Relatively large" and "robust" enough to survive another assault: Journal of Clinical Psychology Vol 63(4) Apr 2007, 401-403. Wampold, B. E., Mondin, G. W., Moody, M., & Ahn, H.-n. (1997). The flat earth as a metaphor for the evidence for uniform efficacy of bona fide psychotherapies: Reply to Crits-Christoph (1997) and Howard et al. (1997): Psychological Bulletin Vol 122(3) Nov 1997, 226-230. Wampold, B. E., Mondin, G. W., Moody, M., Stich, F., Benson, K., & Ahn, H.-n. (1997). A meta-analysis of outcome studies comparing bona fide psychotherapies: Empiricially, "all must have prizes." Psychological Bulletin Vol 122(3) Nov 1997, 203-215. Wampold, B. E., & Serlin, R. C. (2000). The consequence of ignoring a nested factor on measures of effect size in analysis of variance: Psychological Methods Vol 5(4) Dec 2000, 425-433. Wang, Q., & Li, J. (1998). A research on the computer simulation of effect comparison of the test validities of discrimination distribution and difficulty distribution: Psychological Science (China) Vol 21(2) 1998, 111-114. Wang, S., Jiao, H., Young, M. J., Brooks, T., & Olson, J. (2007). A meta-analysis of testing mode effects in grade K-12 mathematics tests: Educational and Psychological Measurement Vol 67(2) Apr 2007, 219-238. Wang, W.-C. (2004). Direct Estimation of Correlation as a Measure of Association Strength Using Multidimensional Item Response Models: Educational and Psychological Measurement Vol 64(6) Dec 2004, 937-955. Wang, W.-C., & Chen, H.-C. (2004). The Standardized Mean Difference Within the Framework of Item Response Theory: Educational and Psychological Measurement Vol 64(2) Apr 2004, 201-223. Wang, W.-C., & Chyi-In, W. (2004). Gain Score in Item Response Theory as an Effect Size Measure: Educational and Psychological Measurement Vol 64(5) Oct 2004, 758-780. Wang, Z., & Thompson, B. (2007). Is the Pearson rsuperscript 2 Biased, and if So, What Is the Best Correction Formula? : Journal of Experimental Education Vol 75(2) Win 2007, 109-125. Ward, R. M. (2002). Highly significant findings in psychology: A power and effect size survey. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering. Watanabe, H. (1993). A Bayesian meta-analysis for reviewing effect sizes: Japanese Psychological Research Vol 35(3) 1993, 153-156. Wendorf, C. A. (2004). Primer on Multiple Regression Coding: Common Forms and the Additional Case of Repeated Contrasts: Understanding Statistics Vol 3(1) 2004, 47-57. Westen, D., & Rosenthal, R. (2003). Quantifying construct validity: Two simple measures: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Vol 84(3) Mar 2003, 608-618. Wilcox, R. R. (1995). ANOVA: A paradigm for low power and misleading measures of effect size? : Review of Educational Research Vol 65(1) Spr 1995, 51-77. Wilcox, R. R. (2003). Power: Basics, practical problems, and possible solutions. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc. Wilcox, R. R. (2004). Kernel Density Estimators: An Approach to Understanding How Groups Differ: Understanding Statistics Vol 3(4) 2004, 333-348. Wilcox, R. R. (2004). A multivariate projection-type analogue of the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test: British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology Vol 57(2) Nov 2004, 205-213. Wilcox, R. R. (2006). Graphical Methods for Assessing Effect Size: Some Alternatives to Cohen's d: Journal of Experimental Education Vol 74(4) Sum 2006, 353-367. Wilcox, R. R., & Muska, J. (1999). Measuring effect size: A non-parametric analogue of omega superscript 2: British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology Vol 52(1) May 1999, 93-110. Wilkerson, M., & Olson, M. R. (1997). Misconceptions about sample size, statistical significance, and treatment effect: Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied Vol 131(6) Nov 1997, 627-631. Wilson, D. B., & Lipsey, M. W. (2001). The role of method in treatment effectiveness research: Evidence from meta-analysis: Psychological Methods Vol 6(4) Dec 2001, 413-429. Wilson, D. B., & Lipsey, M. W. (2003). The role of method in treatment effectiveness research: Evidence from meta-analysis. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Wilson, D. B., & Shadish, W. R. (2006). On Blowing Trumpets to the Tulips: To Prove or Not to Prove the Null Hypothesis—Comment on Bosch, Steinkamp, and Boller (2006): Psychological Bulletin Vol 132(4) Jul 2006, 524-528. Wood, G. R. (1989). A simulation of conjoint measurement and functional measurement procedures under varying conditions of measurement error, effect size pattern, scale translation, and replications: Dissertation Abstracts International. Wu, Y.-w. B. (1984). The effects of heterogeneous regression slopes on the robustness of two test statistics in the analysis of covariance: Educational and Psychological Measurement Vol 44(3) Fal 1984, 647-663. Wu, Y.-W. B., & Wooldridge, P. J. (2005). The Impact of Centering First-Level Predictors on Individual and Contextual Effects in Multilevel Data Analysis: Nursing Research Vol 54(3) May-Jun 2005, 212-216. Wyma, R. J. (1990). Involving children as active agents of their own treatment: A meta-analysis of self-management training: Dissertation Abstracts International. Yin, R. K., Schmidt, R. J., & Besag, F. (2006). Aggregating Student Achievement Trends Across States With Different Tests: Using Standardized Slopes as Effect Sizes: Peabody Journal of Education Vol 81(2) 2006, 47-61. Yoder, P. J., & Feurer, I. D. (2000). Quantifying the magnitude of sequential association between events or behaviors. Baltimore, MD: Paul H Brookes Publishing. Yong, W., Mouchao, M., Li, L., & Xiaqi, D. (2003). Memory effect of banner web - ad: Acta Psychologica Sinica Vol 35(6) 2003, 830-834. Yuan, K.-H., & Maxwell, S. (2005). On the Post Hoc Power in Testing Mean Differences: Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics Vol 30(2) Sum 2005, 141-167. Zakzanis, K. K. (2001). Statistics to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth: Formulae, illustrative numerical examples, and heuristic interpretation of effect size analyses for neuropsychological researchers: Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology Vol 16(7) Oct 2001, 653-667. Zelazo, P. D., & Shultz, T. R. (1989). Concepts of potency and resistance in causal prediction: Child Development Vol 60(6) Dec 1989, 1307-1315. Zhang, Z., & Schoeps, N. (1997). On robust estimation of effect size under semiparametric models: Psychometrika Vol 62(2) Jun 1997, 201-214. Zimmerman, D. W. (2002). A warning about statistical significance tests performed on large samples of nonindependent observations: Perceptual and Motor Skills Vol 94(1) Feb 2002, 259-263. Zou, G. Y. (2005). Quantifying responsiveness of quality of life measures without an external criterion: Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care & Rehabilitation Vol 14(6) Aug 2005, 1545-1552. Zumbo, B. D., & Jennings, M. J. (2002). The robustness of validity and efficiency of the related samples t-test in the presence of outliers: Psicologica Vol 23(2) 2002, 415-450. Zwick, R., & Thayer, D. T. (1996). Evaluating the magnitude of differential item functioning in polytomous items: Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics Vol 21(3) Fal 1996, 187-201. External links Software Free Effect Size Generator Software - PC & Mac Software Free Odds Ratio Generator Software - PC Software Free GPower Software - PC & Mac Software Free Effect Size Calculator for Multiple Regression - Web Based Free Effect Size Calculator for Hierarchical Multiple Regression - Web Based Further Explanations Effect Size (ES) Measuring Effect Size Effect size for two independent groups Effect size for two dependent groups This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia (view authors).

Si quieres conocer otros artículos parecidos a Tamaño del efecto (estadístico) puedes visitar la categoría Clinical research.

Deja una respuesta

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada.

Subir

we use own and third party cookies to improve user experience More information